Pages

3.20.2011

NORA AUNOR: A Library Section In Iriga


By Juan Escandor Jr.
Philippine Daily Inquirer
First Posted 23:49:00 03/16/2011




NORA AUNOR, the poor girl hawking water in the train station of Iriga in the 1960s, who rose to become the “superstar” of Philippine cinema, is now a section of the Iriga City Public Library (ICPL).

With an initial collection of 129 volumes of books and 68 compact discs (CDs) and DVDs on her life and work as a singer and actress, the Nora Aunor Section is a tribute to the most famous Irigueña whose story from obscurity to celebrity captivated the nation in the 1970s, according to Flora Salvador, ICPL librarian.
Aunor’s fans, connected in the virtual world of the Internet since 2000, initiated the compilation of books about their idol including films on DVDs and records of her songs in CDs to make up the section dedicated to her, says Salvador.

Collaboration


The Nora Aunor Section is a collaboration of the city government and the 600-member International Circle of Online Noranians (Icon), a Texas-based fan group founded by Leonel Escota.

Salvador says Icon was organized online to encourage the appreciation of Aunor’s body of work and preserve her contribution to the Philippine movie industry.

Prominently hung in the section is a sepia photo of the late Ricky Belmonte and Nora Aunor sitting on the hood of a school bus of the Mabini Memorial University (now the University of Northeastern Philippines) which was supposedly taken in the ’70s during the filming of one of her movies in her hometown.

Neatly tacked in the bookshelf are some titles like “Nora Aunor Through the Years,” “Nora Aunor Superstar” and “Unsinkable Movie Queen.” Her movies on DVDs and songs on CDs are arranged in another shelf.

Breaking records


“No other native of Iriga had made the name of the town a household word than Nora Aunor. In her heyday, the mere mention of Nora, who was born Nora Cabaltera Villamayor in Iriga City on May 21, 1953, immediately associates her with Iriga and the PNR (Philippine National Railway) train station where she sold water in bottles to passengers of the train,” says Francisco Peñones, public information officer of the city.

Peñones says Nora Aunor became popular when the country’s consciousness about Bicol was only through the train (ironically named Bicol Express as it always arrived late); and the hot dish with which the train lent its name.

“While other Bicol movie personalities had preceded her in the industry, Nora can be said to have made the country more aware of Bicol,” he asserts.

Peñones says Aunor is an icon who transcended the social divide between the rich and the poor in the turbulent years of the ’70s, when the Philippine Free Press came out with its winning photo competition piece of socialites in Manila emerging from a posh hotel and being met by a group of placard-bearing protesters.


Superstar


Moreover, Aunor broke the mestiza syndrome in the industry. “Her following ranges from the burgis to the bakya. Her TV show, appropriately named ‘Superstar,’ an appellation obviously culled from the musical, is a testament to her staying and drawing power. At its end, it was the longest running TV show on Philippine entertainment history,” he adds.

Burgis was an adoption of a Marxist term bourgeoisie which means “well-to-do or rich” while the bakya referred to poor ordinary people which literally meant wooden clogs, explains Peñones.
According to Icon, Aunor’s “Pearly Shells” was a major hit in 1971, when songs were recorded and listened to in vinyl discs played in turntables.

“The ’70s was characterized by political uncertainties with foreign singers dominating the airwaves. However, the entry of Nora Aunor changed the beat of that era by delivering millions of sales for her records, surpassing those of the Beatles, the Supremes and Jackson Five. In the consumers’ hierarchy of needs, a Nora vinyl is included in the priority list. It is safe to say that it was Nora Aunor who helped fuel the microeconomy that is the music industry during that turbulent era. Until today, no single Filipino celebrity can claim to have affected the industry and the economy as a whole other than Nora Aunor,” according to Tim A. Capellan, managing director of InAsia Management and Consultancy, a respected retail and marketing consulting firm in the country.

Other record-breaking feat of this diminutive Irigueña are her 30 gold singles and 260 singles and recording of more than 500 songs.

The beginnings


Aunor began her career doing the rounds of amateur singing contests, under the tutelage of her aunt and uncle, Belen and Saturnino Aunor, who took her under their custody and from whom she got her screen name, the Cultural Center of the Philippines Encyclopedia-Filmrevealed.

“She emerged champion in the nationwide show, ‘Tawag ng Tanghalan.’ Her successful stint in Tawag as well as in ‘Darigold Jamboree’ led to her phenomenal rise as a major star of the Philippine movie industry, which accorded her the title ‘superstar.’ This led to Sampaguita Pictures contract with star builder Dr. Jose R. Perez who cast her in the films like “Way Out in the Country” (1967), “Cinderella A-Go-Go” (1967), “All Over the World” (1967), and “Ye-Ye Generation” (1968).”

It also cited Aunor’s inclusion in the Hall of Fame of the Filipino Academy of Movie Arts and Sciences as a five-time actress awardee and other recognitions for her films done from the 1970s to the 1990s.

Recently, the Cable News Network entertainment website voted Ishmael Bernal’s “Himala” as the best movie of all time in the Asia-Pacific region in 2008 which starred Nora Aunor as a simple provincial lass turned healer.

Bernal’s movie outclassed such greats as Akira Kurosawa’s “Seven Samurai” and Ang Lee’s “Crouching Tiger,Hidden Dragon.”

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/inquirerheadlines/regions/view/20110316-325865/Nora-Aunor-A-library-section-in-Iriga
Source Image: http://superstarstruck.weebly.com/,
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=205334306163137&set=a.166198193410082.38946.166167646746470&theater

3.19.2011

I THIRST


SEARCHING FOR NEW  PURPOSE . . .
                         NEW MEANING IN LIFE?  

Special days to ponder on life’s meaning and challenges.

Designed for people from forty to sixty five years in life.  

March  26, 2011          TOWARDS INTEGRITY
                                                 (A Lenten Recollection) 
 Healing one’s past hurts and pains, opening up to  repentance,   forgiveness and Life.

 May  28,  2011                REDISCOVERING OUR  BODY AT FORTY
 Learning  how to take the toll of the years graciously and gracefully.
July  23,  2011                A NEW PERSPECTIVE

                                     ON FEAR
Facing failures, loneliness,  isolation, and death with trust and  confidence .
September  24,  2011      FULFILLING YOUR  DREAMS
 Building dreams, bold aspirations, and self-fulfilment;    being   productive in the Community and in the Church.
 December 10,  2011        MIDLIFE : CALL TO A DEEPER SPIRITUAL LIFE
Maturing in one’s   faith,   growing spiritually and finding   one’s  mission  with Christ  in  the Church. 



Venue:
Notre Dame de Vie  Retreat House,
123 Susano Road, Brgy San Agustin,  Novaliches,  Quezon  City   

For Reservation :
Ms. Amie Sison,
Telephone # :  9368612;
CP   # 0928 4241864
E–Mail Address : ndv_retreat_house@yahoo.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source Image: 

2.22.2011

Mga Ligaw na Anghel


Ilang taon na rin ang nakakaraan nang muli kong mahawakan ang nakaukit na imahen ng ating tipanan.  Sa tuwing pinagmamasdan ko ang sining ng ating pagmamahalan na nakasabit sa dingding, bumabalik ang ala-ala ng lumipas na panahon. 


Sa isang mall, habang ang iyong kaliwang kamay ay nakayakap sa akin, sabay nating binigyang kulay ang inukit na larawan simula ng pag-usbong ng pagsintang 'di magmamaliw.  Ngunit ito rin pala ang simula ng tuluyang paghihiwalay sapagkat kailangan mo nang bumalik sa tahanan ng Amang nasa langit.  


Makalipas ang halos isang dekada, sa muling pagsilip sa ating obra maestra, ngayon ko napagtanto na ito pala ay sining ng paghihiwalay, ng paglisan, ng pamamaalam.  Sa pagkakataon na ito, muli na naman tayong pinagtagpo sa harap ng ating tipan ng pag-ibig upang sa mga sandaling ito, ialay sa'yo ang panalanging: sumaiyo nawa ang kapayapaan sa buhay na walang hanggan.

2.04.2011

CHOOSING LIFE, REJECTING THE RH BILL (A Pastoral Letter of the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines)

[This can help in explaining the issues to people who may not understand the issues from the point of view of our faith, clear just by listening to it.]

Our Filipino Brothers and Sisters:

The State values the dignity of every human person and guarantees full respect for human rights (Art. II, Section 11). The State recognizes the sanctity of family life and shall protect and strengthen the family as a basic autonomous social institution. It shall equally protect the life of the mother and the life of the unborn from conception (Art. II, Section 12).

Background
We begin by citing the Philippine Constitution. We do so because we intend to write you on the basis of the fundamental ideals and aspirations of the Filipino people and not on the basis of specifically Catholic religious teachings.

We are at a crossroads as a nation. Before us are several versions of a proposed bill, the Reproductive Health bill or sanitized as a Responsible Parenthood bill. This proposed bill in all its versions calls us to make a moral choice: to choose life or to choose death.

At the outset we thank the government for affording us an opportunity to express our views in friendly dialogue. Sadly our dialogue has simply revealed how far apart our respective positions are. Therefore, instead of building false hopes, we wish at the present time to draw up clearly what we object to and what we stand for.

Moral Choices at the Crossroads -- at EDSA I and Now
Twenty five years ago in 1986 we Catholic Bishops made a prophetic moral judgment on political leadership. With this prophetic declaration we believe that we somehow significantly helped open the door for EDSA I and a window of political integrity.

Today we come to a new national crossroads and we now have to make a similar moral choice. Our President rallied the country with the election cry, “Kung walang corrupt walang mahirap.” As religious leaders we believe that there is a greater form of corruption, namely, moral corruption which is really the root of all corruption. On the present issue, it would be morally corrupt to disregard the moral implications of the RH bill.

This is our unanimous collective moral judgment: We strongly reject the RH bill.


Commonly Shared Human and Cultural Values – Two Fundamental Principles
Far from being simply a Catholic issue, the RH bill is a major attack on authentic human values and on Filipino cultural values regarding human life that all of us have cherished since time immemorial.

Simply stated the RH Bill does not respect moral sense that is central to Filipino cultures. It is the product of the spirit of this world, a secularist, materialistic spirit that considers morality as a set of teachings from which one can choose, according to the spirit of the age. Some it accepts, others it does not accept. Unfortunately, we see the subtle spread of this post-modern spirit in our own Filipino society.

Our position stands firmly on two of the core principles commonly shared by all who believe in God:

(1) Human life is the most sacred physical gift with which God, the author of life, endows a human being. Placing artificial obstacles to prevent human life from being formed and being born most certainly contradicts this fundamental truth of human life. In the light of the widespread influence of the post-modern spirit in our world, we consider this position as nothing less than prophetic. As religious leaders we must proclaim this truth fearlessly in season and out of season.

(2) It is parents, cooperating with God, who bring children into the world. It is also they who have the primary inalienable right and responsibility to nurture them, care for them, and educate them that they might grow as mature persons according to the will of the Creator.

What We Specifically Object to in the RH Bill
Advocates contend that the RH bill promotes reproductive health. The RH Bill certainly does not. It does not protect the health of the sacred human life that is being formed or born. The very name “contraceptive” already reveals the anti-life nature of the means that the RH bill promotes. These artificial means are fatal to human life, either preventing it from fruition or actually destroying it. Moreover, scientists have known for a long time that contraceptives may cause cancer. Contraceptives are hazardous to a woman’s health.

Advocates also say that the RH bill will reduce abortion rates. But many scientific analysts themselves wonder why prevalent contraceptive use sometimes raises the abortion rate. In truth, contraceptives provide a false sense of security that takes away the inhibition to sexual activity. Scientists have noted numerous cases of contraceptive failure. Abortion is resorted to, an act that all religious traditions would judge as sinful. “Safe sex” to diminish abortion rate is false propaganda.

Advocates moreover say that the RH bill will prevent the spread of HIV/AIDS. This goes against the grain of many available scientific data. In some countries where condom use is prevalent, HIV/ AIDS continues to spread. Condoms provide a false security that strongly entices individuals towards increased sexual activity, increasing likewise the incidence of HIV/AIDS. “Safe sex” to prevent HIV /AIDS is false propaganda.

Advocates also assert that the RH Bill empowers women with ownership of their own bodies. This is in line with the post-modern spirit declaring that women have power over their own bodies without the dictation of any religion. How misguided this so-called “new truth” is! For, indeed, as created by God our bodies are given to us to keep and nourish. We are stewards of our own bodies and we must follow God’s will on this matter according to an informed and right conscience. Such a conscience must certainly be enlightened and guided by religious and moral teachings provided by various religious and cultural traditions regarding the fundamental dignity and worth of human life.

Advocates also say that the RH bill is necessary to stop overpopulation and to escape from poverty. Our own government statistical office has concluded that there is no overpopulation in the Philippines but only the over-concentration of population in a number of urban centers. Despite other findings to the contrary, we must also consider the findings of a significant group of renowned economic scholars, including economic Nobel laureates, who have found no direct correlation between population and poverty. In fact, many Filipino scholars have concluded that population is not the cause of our poverty. The causes of our poverty are: flawed philosophies of development, misguided economic policies, greed, corruption, social inequities, lack of access to education, poor economic and social services, poor infrastructures, etc. World organizations estimate that in our country more than P400 billion pesos are lost yearly to corruption. The conclusion is unavoidable: for our country to escape from poverty, we have to address the real causes of poverty and not population.

In the light of the above, we express our clear objections:
1. We object to the non-consideration of moral principles, the bedrock of law, in legislative discussions of bills that are intended for the good of individuals and for the common good.

2. We are against the anti-life, anti-natal and contraceptive mentality that is reflected in media and in some proposed legislative bills.
3. We object strongly to efforts at railroading the passage of the RH bill.

4. We denounce the over-all trajectory of the RH bill towards population control.

5. We denounce the use of public funds for contraceptives and sterilization.

6. We condemn compulsory sex education that would effectively let parents abdicate their primary role of educating their own children, especially in an area of life – sexuality – which is a sacred gift of God.

What We Stand For

On this matter of proposed RH bills, these are our firm convictions:
1. We are deeply concerned about the plight of the many poor, especially of suffering women, who are struggling for a better life and who must seek it outside of our country, or have recourse to a livelihood less than decent.

2. We are pro-life. We must defend human life from the moment of conception or fertilization up to its natural end.

3. We believe in the responsible and natural regulation of births through Natural Family Planning for which character building is necessary which involves sacrifice, discipline and respect for the dignity of the spouse.

4. We believe that we are only stewards of our own bodies. Responsibility over our own bodies must follow the will of God who speaks to us through conscience.

5. We hold that on the choices related to the RH bill, conscience must not only be informed but most of all rightly guided through the teachings of one’s faith.

6. We believe in the freedom of religion and the right of conscientious objection in matters that are contrary to one’s faith. The sanctions and penalties embodied in the proposed RH bill are one more reason for us to denounce it.

Our Calls
As religious leaders we have deeply and prayerfully reflected on this burning issue. We have unanimously made the moral judgment – to reject the RH agenda and to choose life.

1. We call for a fundamental transformation of our attitudes and behavior towards all human life especially the most defenseless, namely, human life being formed or being conceived. The cheapness with which many seem to consider human life is a great bane to our religious-oriented nation.

2. We call upon our legislators to consider the RH bill in the light of the God-given dignity and worth of human life and, therefore, to shelve it completely as contrary to our ideals and aspirations as a people. We thank our legislators who have filed bills to defend human life from the moment of conception and call upon all other legislators to join their ranks.

3. We thank the great multitude of lay people all over the country, and particularly the dedicated groups who made their presence felt in the halls of Congress, to defend and promote our position. We call upon other lay people and adherents of other religions to join the advocacy to defend and promote our commonly shared ideals and aspirations.

4. We call on our government to address effectively the real causes of poverty such as corruption, lack of social and economic services, lack of access to education and the benefits of development, social inequities.

5. We call for the establishment of more hospitals and clinics in the rural areas, the deployment of more health personnel to provide more access to health services, the building of more schools, the provision of more aid to the poor for education, and the building of more and better infrastructures necessary for development.

6. We echo the challenge we prophetically uttered 25 years ago at EDSA I and call upon all people of good will who share our conviction: “…let us pray together, reason together, decide together, act together, always to the end that the truth prevail” over the many threats to human life and to our shared human and cultural values.
We commend our efforts against the RH bill (or the Responsible Parenthood bill – its new name) to the blessing of our almighty and loving God, from whom all life comes and for whom it is destined.

For the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines.

+NEREO P. ODCHIMAR, D.D.
Bishop of Tandag
President, CBCP
January 30, 2011
------------------------------------------
Source: http://cbcpnews.com/?q=node/14472